A shorter entry this week as I’m catching up from a
vacation I took last week to Washington State, which included hikes in Olympic
National Park, kayaking around the San Juan Islands, and an amazing site visit
to the Bullock Brothers Homestead, one of the oldest permaculture sites in the
USA.
To pick up where the last post left off – disturbance – I
mentioned wanting to expand more on the idea that we humans can design and
induce disturbance in ecological design to propel a system to new levels of biodiversity,
interconnection, etc.
A key element to this notion is that human created
disturbance is NOT being proposed on the same scale or intensity we see in
natural events. In fact since we are looking at disturbances in the context of
systems we are managing for yields, we wouldn’t want to see change happen so
drastically. The hundreds and thousands of downed trees up in the Adirondacks
from the aftermath of hurricane Irene are going to be felt in the system for a
long time to come. I’m not talking about this with our own interventions.
So what do human-scale disturbances look like? A simple one
is the creation of gaps or clearings in small forest stands, which stimulates
understory growth, allows for the regeneration of sun loving species, and
supports habit for a wide range of birds you won’t find in more mature stands.
A meaningful gap needs to be large enough to get sunlight to
the floor – often a few trees won’t be worth the effort. I’ve read and seen the
most effective gaps to be two to four times the height of the forest canopy. In
other words, if you have an overstory that is 80 feet tall, a good gap would be
somewhere between 160 and 320 feet wide.
Gaps could be circular, with a radius of the above figures,
but it could also be a linear gap as well. I visited a forest in Delaware
County, NY that demonstrated some interesting potential for small strip gaps in
forests. The forest had been thinned in 1996 and all along the old logging
roads now serving as trails were an amazing abundance of species that were
shade tolerant but liked some light, including elderberries, currants, and many
ribes species. I noted that the best growth was on the gaps that extended from
East to West, giving the longest solar exposure during the warm summer months.
Nature plays out natural selection....slowly. |
Many folks
might assume much of holistic forestry would be planting trees. While in some
cases this may be the case, but a more effective (and realistic) approach is to
create the conditions for regeneration, letting the forest determine the
appropriate species composition based on good old natural selection. When I
find a White Oak or a Tulip Popular around these parts I often see if a gap is
feasible on the South side of the seed tree, to enhance to possibility for
regeneration.
It IS appropriate to plant trees in cases where viable
healthy specimens are scarce – such as large tracts of old farmland that don’t
have excellent seed sources nearby. In this case we can employ another example
of disturbance that mimics what nature does – overseeding.
Often when I come across tree planting guides, they
emphasize that tress should be spaced to allow for maximum canopy development.
So for example, Black Walnuts or Oaks should be give 50 to 60 feet of spacing,
which they will eventually fill in.
The problem with this strategy is two fold. First is that
likely a decent percentage will die off before maturity; especially when stock
is grown from seed and the resulting genetics rather random in their growth
characteristics. The other major problem is that a tree in an open field grows
OUT as much as UP. I’ve seen several planted fields that, at a certain spacing,
produce trees that are attractive but have little timber or wood value. Trees
don’t grow without competition in the forest, and that struggle for sunlight is
what makes the healthiest, strongest trees.
An important task we need to undertake as stewards of
forests is collecting seed from local trees and growing it out, selecting out
the inferior trees along the way. We could then re-grow a forest much like it
would occur naturally – with thousands of trees per acre winnowing down over
time to hundreds of mature specimens. Unless you are paying top dollar for high
quality stock that someone else took the time to select out, the only way to do
this is to get planting, observe, and make choices.
Close spacing makes these trees nice and straight. |
The only guaranteed way to get 100% superior trees growing
is to graft species known to perform well onto rootstock. This method is one
used by orchardists who want fruits that are true to the parent. While this
method may work for those who have a direct commercial interest in a species,
it becomes less practical on a large scale when our main goal is reforestation.
In this case we might look for ways to set the system in motion, let nature
play it out, and intervene as an agent of disturbance over a longer time scale.
So far we’ve discussed overall thinning, the creation of
gaps, and overseeding as methods of human-induced disturbance.What are some examples you can think of?